1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 vs. 2011 Cadillac STS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac STS is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 would be higher. At 7,255 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 (582 HP) has 280 more horse power than 2011 Cadillac STS. (302 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 should accelerate faster than 2011 Cadillac STS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 weights approximately 500 kg more than 2011 Cadillac STS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 (773 Nm) has 405 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Cadillac STS. (368 Nm). This means 1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Cadillac STS.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mercedes-Benz T V-12 | 2011 Cadillac STS | |
Make | Mercedes-Benz | Cadillac |
Model | T V-12 | STS |
Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7255 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 12 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 582 HP | 302 HP |
Torque | 773 Nm | 368 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 2302 kg | 1802 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2957 mm |