1997 Mercury Cougar vs. 2008 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2008 Volvo XC90 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 3,800 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 41 kg more than 1997 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2008 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mercury Cougar | 2008 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Cougar | XC90 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2008 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3800 cc | 3199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 235 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1661 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5090 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1900 mm |