1997 Mercury MC4 vs. 2005 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2005 Smart ForFour is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury MC4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury MC4 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Mercury MC4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercury MC4 (202 HP @ 4250 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 2005 Smart ForFour. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercury MC4 should accelerate faster than 2005 Smart ForFour.
Because 1997 Mercury MC4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Mercury MC4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mercury MC4 (387 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 286 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Smart ForFour. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1997 Mercury MC4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Smart ForFour.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mercury MC4 | 2005 Smart ForFour | |
Make | Mercury | Smart |
Model | MC4 | ForFour |
Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 1124 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 387 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 225 km/hour | 165 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |