1997 Mercury MC4 vs. 2009 Saturn Aura
To start off, 2009 Saturn Aura is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury MC4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury MC4 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Mercury MC4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Saturn Aura (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1997 Mercury MC4. (202 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Aura should accelerate faster than 1997 Mercury MC4.
Because 1997 Mercury MC4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Mercury MC4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Saturn Aura, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mercury MC4 (387 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Saturn Aura. (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1997 Mercury MC4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Saturn Aura.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mercury MC4 | 2009 Saturn Aura | |
Make | Mercury | Saturn |
Model | MC4 | Aura |
Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4601 cc | 3563 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 387 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |