1997 Mercury MC4 vs. 2012 Ford Ecosport

To start off, 2012 Ford Ecosport is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury MC4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury MC4 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Mercury MC4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercury MC4 (202 HP) has 84 more horse power than 2012 Ford Ecosport. (118 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercury MC4 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Ecosport.

Because 1997 Mercury MC4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Mercury MC4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mercury MC4 (387 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Ecosport. (170 Nm @ 1300 RPM). This means 1997 Mercury MC4 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Ecosport. 1997 Mercury MC4 has automatic transmission and 2012 Ford Ecosport has manual transmission. 2012 Ford Ecosport will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Mercury MC4 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: