1997 Mercury Villager vs. 2001 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2001 Toyota Tundra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 4,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1997 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1997 Mercury Villager.
Because 2001 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mercury Villager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mercury Villager | 2001 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Mercury | Toyota |
Model | Villager | Tundra |
Year Released | 1997 | 2001 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2960 cc | 4700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3270 mm |