1997 Mercury Villager vs. 2003 Volvo V50
To start off, 2003 Volvo V50 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2003 Volvo V50. (139 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2003 Volvo V50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercury Villager weights approximately 335 kg more than 2003 Volvo V50. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mercury Villager | 2003 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Mercury | Volvo |
Model | Villager | V50 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2003 |
Body Type | Minivan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2960 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1465 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2720 mm |