1997 Mercury Villager vs. 2005 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2005 Volvo XC90 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 119 more horse power than 1997 Mercury Villager. (149 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1997 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercury Villager weights approximately 362 kg more than 2005 Volvo XC90.
Because 2005 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mercury Villager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mercury Villager | 2005 Volvo XC90 | |
| Make | Mercury | Volvo |
| Model | Villager | XC90 |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2960 cc | 2922 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 268 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1438 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2720 mm |
