1997 Mercury Villager vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercury Villager (149 HP) has 40 more horse power than 2009 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mercury Villager | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mercury | Ford |
| Model | Villager | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2960 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 149 HP | 109 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2490 mm |
