1997 Mercury Villager vs. 2010 Mazda 5
To start off, 2010 Mazda 5 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 5 (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1997 Mercury Villager. (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1997 Mercury Villager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercury Villager weights approximately 222 kg more than 2010 Mazda 5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mercury Villager | 2010 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Mercury | Mazda |
Model | Villager | 5 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2960 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1578 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1753 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1631 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2751 mm |