1997 Mercury Villager vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2013 Kia RIO. (136 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2013 Kia RIO. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mercury Villager weights approximately 704 kg more than 2013 Kia RIO. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mercury Villager | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Mercury | Kia |
Model | Villager | RIO |
Year Released | 1997 | 2013 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2960 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 149 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1096 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4950 mm | 4045 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1790 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2570 mm |