1997 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2006 Renault Clio
To start off, 2006 Renault Clio is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 800 kg more than 2006 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2006 Renault Clio | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Renault |
Model | Challenger | Clio |
Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 97 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2690 mm |