1997 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2009 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2009 Ford Ecosport is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2009 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Challenger | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 1400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2490 mm |
