1997 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2010 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2010 Toyota Camry is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 161 kg more than 2010 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2010 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Challenger | Camry |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2300 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 187 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 1669 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4806 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1471 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2776 mm |