1997 Mitsubishi Challenger vs. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 198 kg more than 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mitsubishi Challenger | 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Jeep |
| Model | Challenger | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2300 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 290 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1830 kg | 2028 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4540 mm | 4821 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1938 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1740 mm | 1763 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2916 mm |
