1997 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,349 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1997 Mitsubishi Magna. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1997 Mitsubishi Magna.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Mitsubishi Magna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1997 Mitsubishi Magna has manual transmission. 1997 Mitsubishi Magna will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mitsubishi Magna | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Magna | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1997 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2349 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2490 mm |