1997 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 2006 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2006 Ford Ecosport is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,349 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 2 more horse power than 1997 Mitsubishi Magna. (141 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1997 Mitsubishi Magna.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mitsubishi Magna | 2006 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Magna | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2349 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2490 mm |