1997 Mitsubishi Magna vs. 2011 Ford Ka
To start off, 2011 Ford Ka is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Magna. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Magna would be higher. At 2,349 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mitsubishi Magna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mitsubishi Magna (141 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2011 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mitsubishi Magna should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Ka.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mitsubishi Magna (205 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Mitsubishi Magna will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mitsubishi Magna | 2011 Ford Ka | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
Model | Magna | Ka |
Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2349 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 141 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 205 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86.5 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 75.5 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2730 mm | 2450 mm |