1997 Mitsubishi Pajero vs. 2010 Volvo C70
To start off, 2010 Volvo C70 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C70 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo C70 weights approximately 890 kg more than 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Because 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Volvo C70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Volvo C70 has automatic transmission and 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero has manual transmission. 1997 Mitsubishi Pajero will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Volvo C70 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mitsubishi Pajero | 2010 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Volvo |
Model | Pajero | C70 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 698 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1836 mm |