1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 1945 Riley RM A
To start off, 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1945 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1945 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,834 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1945 Riley RM A weights approximately 20 kg more than 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Because 1945 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1945 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 1945 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Riley |
| Model | Space Runner | RM A |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1945 |
| Engine Size | 1834 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 120 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1215 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2870 mm |
