1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs. 2006 Rover 75
To start off, 2006 Rover 75 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Rover 75 (256 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (120 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Rover 75 should accelerate faster than 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Rover 75 (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner. (165 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2006 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner | 2006 Rover 75 | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Rover |
Model | Space Runner | 75 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1834 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 120 HP | 256 HP |
Torque | 165 Nm | 245 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2750 mm |