1997 Nissan Cefiro vs. 2010 Ford Ka
To start off, 2010 Ford Ka is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 2,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Nissan Cefiro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Nissan Cefiro weights approximately 375 kg more than 2010 Ford Ka.
Because 1997 Nissan Cefiro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Nissan Cefiro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Nissan Cefiro has automatic transmission and 2010 Ford Ka has manual transmission. 2010 Ford Ka will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Nissan Cefiro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Nissan Cefiro | 2010 Ford Ka | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Cefiro | Ka |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 1247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 74 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1510 mm |
