1997 Nissan Cefiro vs. 2010 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 536 kg more than 1997 Nissan Cefiro.
Because 1997 Nissan Cefiro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Nissan Cefiro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Nissan Cefiro | 2010 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Nissan | Mazda |
Model | Cefiro | CX-9 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 273 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1430 kg | 1966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1935 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1727 mm |