1997 Nissan Cima vs. 2008 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2008 Volvo XC90 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 650 kg more than 1997 Nissan Cima.
Because 2008 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Nissan Cima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Nissan Cima | 2008 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Cima | XC90 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 2180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1900 mm |