1997 Nissan Cima vs. 2011 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2011 Ford Ecosport is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2011 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Nissan Cima. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Nissan Cima | 2011 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Cima | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1980 mm |