1997 Nissan Cima vs. 2011 Ford S-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford S-Max is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1997 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford S-Max, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Nissan Cima | 2011 Ford S-Max | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Cima | S-Max |
Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 202 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |