1997 Nissan El Grand vs. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Nissan El Grand. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Nissan El Grand would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Nissan El Grand weights approximately 37 kg more than 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee.
Because 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Nissan El Grand, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee has automatic transmission and 1997 Nissan El Grand has manual transmission. 1997 Nissan El Grand will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Nissan El Grand | 2010 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
| Make | Nissan | Jeep |
| Model | El Grand | Grand Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 3299 cc | 3700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 210 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1970 kg | 1933 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4775 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1844 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1750 mm |
