1997 Nissan Presea vs. 2002 Proton 300
To start off, 2002 Proton 300 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Nissan Presea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Nissan Presea would be higher. At 1,497 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Nissan Presea is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Nissan Presea (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2002 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Nissan Presea should accelerate faster than 2002 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Proton 300 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1997 Nissan Presea.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Nissan Presea (135 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Nissan Presea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Nissan Presea | 2002 Proton 300 | |
Make | Nissan | Proton |
Model | Presea | 300 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1497 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1030 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2450 mm |