1997 Oldsmobile Alero vs. 1965 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1997 Oldsmobile Alero is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Riley Kestrel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Riley Kestrel would be higher. At 3,400 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Oldsmobile Alero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Oldsmobile Alero (170 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile Alero should accelerate faster than 1965 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Oldsmobile Alero weights approximately 675 kg more than 1965 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Oldsmobile Alero (271 Nm) has 187 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Riley Kestrel. (84 Nm). This means 1997 Oldsmobile Alero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Oldsmobile Alero | 1965 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Riley |
| Model | Alero | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1997 | 1965 |
| Engine Size | 3400 cc | 1098 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 170 HP | 53 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 84 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1560 kg | 885 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2720 mm | 2380 mm |
