1997 Oldsmobile Aurora vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Triumph 2.5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Triumph 2.5 would be higher. At 3,995 cc (8 cylinders), 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 636 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Because 1968 Triumph 2.5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Triumph 2.5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora (353 Nm) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Triumph 2.5. (222 Nm). This means 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Oldsmobile Aurora | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
Make | Oldsmobile | Triumph |
Model | Aurora | 2.5 |
Year Released | 1997 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3995 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 150 HP |
Torque | 353 Nm | 222 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86.5 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.8 mm | 95 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1769 kg | 1133 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2700 mm |