1997 Oldsmobile Aurora vs. 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero
To start off, 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora would be higher. At 6,350 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora weights approximately 519 kg more than 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero.
Because 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora has automatic transmission and 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero has manual transmission. 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Oldsmobile Aurora will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Oldsmobile Aurora | 2010 SSC Ultimate Aero | |
Make | Oldsmobile | SSC |
Model | Aurora | Ultimate Aero |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3995 cc | 6350 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 1269 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1769 kg | 1250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5220 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1090 mm |