1997 Peugeot 605 vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Peugeot 605. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Peugeot 605 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1997 Peugeot 605. (136 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1997 Peugeot 605. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 90 kg more than 1997 Peugeot 605. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Cadillac ATS is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Cadillac ATS. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Peugeot 605, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac ATS (353 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Peugeot 605. (180 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac ATS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Peugeot 605. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1997 Peugeot 605 has manual transmission. 1997 Peugeot 605 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Peugeot 605 2013 Cadillac ATS
Make Peugeot Cadillac
Model 605 ATS
Year Released 1997 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 2000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 136 HP 268 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 180 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 5500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 86 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 86 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1440 kg 1530 kg
Vehicle Length 4770 mm 4643 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1806 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2810 mm 2776 mm