1997 Proton 300 vs. 2001 Ford Ranger

To start off, 2001 Ford Ranger is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Proton 300 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford Ranger (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1997 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1997 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford Ranger weights approximately 685 kg more than 1997 Proton 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2001 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Proton 300. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford Ranger (203 Nm) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Proton 300. (108 Nm). This means 2001 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Proton 300. 2001 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 1997 Proton 300 has manual transmission. 1997 Proton 300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: