1997 Proton 300 vs. 2005 Renault Scenic

To start off, 2005 Renault Scenic is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Proton 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Proton 300 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Scenic (133 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 1997 Proton 300. (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1997 Proton 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Scenic weights approximately 735 kg more than 1997 Proton 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Proton 300 (108 Nm) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Scenic. (99 Nm). This means 1997 Proton 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Scenic. 2005 Renault Scenic has automatic transmission and 1997 Proton 300 has manual transmission. 1997 Proton 300 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Renault Scenic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: