1997 Proton 400 vs. 2012 Holden Calais

To start off, 2012 Holden Calais is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Proton 400 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Calais (278 HP) has 204 more horse power than 1997 Proton 400. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 1997 Proton 400.

Because 2012 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Proton 400, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Calais (350 Nm) has 242 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Proton 400. (108 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Proton 400. 2012 Holden Calais has automatic transmission and 1997 Proton 400 has manual transmission. 1997 Proton 400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Holden Calais will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: