1997 Reliant Scimitar vs. 2012 Ford Ka
To start off, 2012 Ford Ka is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Reliant Scimitar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Reliant Scimitar would be higher. At 1,398 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Reliant Scimitar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Reliant Scimitar (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2012 Ford Ka. (68 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Reliant Scimitar should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford Ka.
Because 1997 Reliant Scimitar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Reliant Scimitar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Ford Ka, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Reliant Scimitar (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1997 Reliant Scimitar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Reliant Scimitar | 2012 Ford Ka | |
Make | Reliant | Ford |
Model | Scimitar | Ka |
Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 127 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2140 mm | 2450 mm |