1997 Renault Clio vs. 2000 ZAZ Slavuta
To start off, 2000 ZAZ Slavuta is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,170 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Clio (59 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2000 ZAZ Slavuta. (51 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2000 ZAZ Slavuta. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Clio weights approximately 110 kg more than 2000 ZAZ Slavuta. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Renault Clio | 2000 ZAZ Slavuta | |
| Make | Renault | ZAZ |
| Model | Clio | Slavuta |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1170 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 51 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.8 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 64.9 mm | 67 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.2:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 3990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2330 mm |
