1997 Renault Clio vs. 2009 Nissan Note
To start off, 2009 Nissan Note is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Renault Clio would be higher. At 1,386 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Note is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Note (89 HP) has 30 more horse power than 1997 Renault Clio. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Note should accelerate faster than 1997 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Nissan Note weights approximately 197 kg more than 1997 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Renault Clio | 2009 Nissan Note | |
Make | Renault | Nissan |
Model | Clio | Note |
Year Released | 1997 | 2009 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1170 cc | 1386 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 855 kg | 1052 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3710 mm | 4083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1691 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2600 mm |