1997 Renault Helem vs. 1983 Toyota Celica

To start off, 1997 Renault Helem is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 395 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Celica. (115 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 485 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Toyota Celica (172 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 1983 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem. 1983 Toyota Celica has automatic transmission and 1997 Renault Helem has manual transmission. 1997 Renault Helem will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1983 Toyota Celica will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: