1997 Renault Helem vs. 2006 Smart ForFour
To start off, 2006 Smart ForFour is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Renault Helem. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Renault Helem would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 435 more horse power than 2006 Smart ForFour. (75 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 2006 Smart ForFour.
Because 1997 Renault Helem is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Renault Helem. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Smart ForFour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Smart ForFour (136 Nm) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 2006 Smart ForFour will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Renault Helem | 2006 Smart ForFour | |
| Make | Renault | Smart |
| Model | Helem | ForFour |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Middle | Front |
| Engine Size | 2975 cc | 1123 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 510 HP | 75 HP |
| Torque | 85 Nm | 136 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Wheelbase Size | 2680 mm | 2510 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 22 L |
