1997 Renault Helem vs. 2008 Volvo S40

To start off, 2008 Volvo S40 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Renault Helem. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Renault Helem would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 341 more horse power than 2008 Volvo S40. (169 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 2008 Volvo S40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 311 kg more than 2008 Volvo S40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1997 Renault Helem is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Renault Helem. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S40, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo S40 (230 Nm) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 2008 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem. 2008 Volvo S40 has automatic transmission and 1997 Renault Helem has manual transmission. 1997 Renault Helem will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Volvo S40 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: