1997 Renault Helem vs. 2010 Mazda 5

To start off, 2010 Mazda 5 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Renault Helem. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Renault Helem would be higher. At 2,975 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Renault Helem is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Renault Helem (510 HP) has 357 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 5. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Renault Helem should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Renault Helem weights approximately 98 kg more than 2010 Mazda 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1997 Renault Helem is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Renault Helem. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 5 (200 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Renault Helem. (85 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Renault Helem.

Compare all specifications: