1997 Rover 200 vs. 2005 Toyota RunX

To start off, 2005 Toyota RunX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota RunX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota RunX (187 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1997 Rover 200. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RunX should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota RunX weights approximately 148 kg more than 1997 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota RunX (180 Nm @ 6800 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 200. (128 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota RunX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 200.

Compare all specifications:

1997 Rover 200 2005 Toyota RunX
Make Rover Toyota
Model 200 RunX
Year Released 1997 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1396 cc 1794 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 102 HP 187 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 7800 RPM
Torque 128 Nm 180 Nm
Torque RPM 5000 RPM 6800 RPM
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1030 kg 1178 kg
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2610 mm