1997 Rover 200 vs. 2011 Honda Civic
To start off, 2011 Honda Civic is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,799 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Honda Civic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Honda Civic (138 HP) has 36 more horse power than 1997 Rover 200. (102 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Honda Civic should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Honda Civic (174 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 200. (127 Nm). This means 2011 Honda Civic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Rover 200 | 2011 Honda Civic | |
Make | Rover | Honda |
Model | 200 | Civic |
Year Released | 1997 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 138 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 174 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 75.1 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 87.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1785 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |