1997 Rover 200 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Rover 200 (141 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Rover 200 (185 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 1997 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1997 Rover 200 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Rover | Chevrolet |
| Model | 200 | Aveo |
| Year Released | 1997 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 99 HP |
| Torque | 185 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2525 mm |
