1997 Rover 400 vs. 2010 Honda Jazz
To start off, 2010 Honda Jazz is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Rover 400 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Rover 400 (110 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2010 Honda Jazz. (77 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Rover 400 should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Rover 400 (145 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Honda Jazz. (110 Nm). This means 1997 Rover 400 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Honda Jazz.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Rover 400 | 2010 Honda Jazz | |
Make | Rover | Honda |
Model | 400 | Jazz |
Year Released | 1997 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1589 cc | 1245 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 77 HP |
Torque | 145 Nm | 110 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79 mm | 80 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2460 mm |