1997 Rover 414i vs. 2008 Rover 25
To start off, 2008 Rover 25 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 414i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 414i would be higher. At 1,399 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Rover 414i is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Rover 414i (103 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2008 Rover 25. (83 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1997 Rover 414i should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Rover 414i weights approximately 375 kg more than 2008 Rover 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Rover 414i (167 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 25. (110 Nm). This means 1997 Rover 414i will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Rover 414i | 2008 Rover 25 | |
Make | Rover | Rover |
Model | 414i | 25 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1399 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 110 Nm |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1085 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2510 mm |