1997 Rover 414i vs. 2008 Volvo S60
To start off, 2008 Volvo S60 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 414i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 414i would be higher. At 2,399 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volvo S60 (256 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volvo S60 weights approximately 82 kg more than 1997 Rover 414i. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Volvo S60 (350 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 414i. (167 Nm). This means 2008 Volvo S60 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 414i.
Compare all specifications:
1997 Rover 414i | 2008 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Rover | Volvo |
Model | 414i | S60 |
Year Released | 1997 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1399 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 350 Nm |
Top Speed | 180 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1460 kg | 1542 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2720 mm |