1997 Rover 414i vs. 2009 Subaru Forester

To start off, 2009 Subaru Forester is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 414i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 414i would be higher. At 2,457 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Subaru Forester is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Subaru Forester (224 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Forester should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Subaru Forester weights approximately 50 kg more than 1997 Rover 414i. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Subaru Forester is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1997 Rover 414i. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Subaru Forester will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Subaru Forester (306 Nm) has 139 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 414i. (167 Nm). This means 2009 Subaru Forester will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 414i. 2009 Subaru Forester has automatic transmission and 1997 Rover 414i has manual transmission. 1997 Rover 414i will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Subaru Forester will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: