1997 Rover 414i vs. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro

To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Rover 414i. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Rover 414i would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1997 Rover 414i. (103 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1997 Rover 414i. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 255 kg more than 1997 Rover 414i. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2010 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Rover 414i, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Camaro (370 Nm) has 203 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Rover 414i. (167 Nm). This means 2010 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Rover 414i.

Compare all specifications: